میراث حقوقی گالستون: بازخوانی فرایند تولّد مفهوم اِکوساید

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

2 دانشجوی دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی، دانشکده حقوق دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران

10.22124/jol.2022.19312.2112

چکیده

مفهوم اِکوساید در واکنش به جنگ اکولوژیکی ویتنام و از رهگذرِ یک شبیه­‌سازی حقوقی توسط آرتور ویلیام گالستون ابداع شد. از نگاه گالستون، همان­طورکه نابودسازی گروه­های انسانی، جنایتی علیه بشریت بوده و تحت‌عنوان «ژنوساید» جرم­‌انگاری شده، نابودسازی زیست­بوم(های) طبیعی نیز جنایتی علیه بشریت بوده و باید تحت‌عنوان «اکوساید» در قالب یک معاهده جرم­‌انگاری شود. این در حالی است که جامعة بین­‌المللی تاکنون نتوانسته است اکوساید را به­عنوان یک جنایت بین­‌المللی مستقل جرم­انگاری کند. در این پژوهش، که با رویکرد توصیفی – تحلیلی و با بهره­‌گیری از منابع کتابخانه­ای انجام شده، فرایند ابداع این مفهوم و چیستی آن در اندیشة حقوقی گالستون بازخوانی و ارزیابی می­شود. هدف آن است که ضمن آشنایی جامعة حقوقی با نظریة حقوقی اکوساید، زمینة جرم­انگاری اکوساید در چهار سطح محلّی، ملی، منطقه­‌ای و بین‌المللی و ظهور یک سیاست جنایی جهان­‌شمول فراهم گردد تا از سیارۀ زمین در برابر آسیب­‌های اکولوژیکی شدید، گسترده و یا بلندمدت حفاظت شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Galston's Legal Legacy: re-reading the Birth Process of the Concept of Ecocide

نویسندگان [English]

  • Bagher Shamloo 1
  • Gholamreza Gholipour 2
1 Associate Professor, Department of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshty University, Tehran, Iran.
2 Ph. D Student, Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

The concept of ecocide was developed in response to the ecological war of the Vietnam through a legal simulation by Galston. In Galston's view, just as the destruction of human groups is a crime against humanity and has been criminalized as "genocide," the destruction of ecosystem(s) is a crime against humanity and must be criminalized as "ecocide" in a treaty. However, the international community has so far failed to implement Galston's idea and criminalize ecocide as an international crime. Using a descriptive-analytical approach and library resources, this research examines the process of developing this concept as well as its essence in Galston's legal perspective and to evaluate it. It aims to familiarize the legal community with the theory of ecocide crime, to provide a ground for ecocide criminalization at the four levels of local, national, regional, and international, as well as for the emergence of an universal criminal policy to protect the Earth against severe, widespread, or long-term ecological damages.
 
1. Introduction
Ecocide is a new concept in the fields of criminal law and international criminal law. This concept refers to the cause of severe, widespread or long-term ecological harm to the environment and ecosystems. The idea of ​​criminalization of ecocide as an international crime was raised in the 1970s for the first time. However, this green legal idea did not become an international criminal norm. This research seeks to study why and how this concept was born in the history of international criminal law.
 
2. Methodology
The current research was conducted in the field of the history of ecocide law. To this end, it was necessary that researchers return to the past and begin their historical studies in this field. The authors used a descriptive-analytical approach and library resources to study the process of invention of the concept of ecocide as well as its essence in Galston's legal thought, and to critique and evaluate this green legal idea from a legal point of view.
 
3. Results and discussion
The concept of "ecocide" was coined in response to the ecological Vietnam War and through a legal analogy by Arthur William Galston, who likened the destruction of Vietnam’s environment by the US military to the Holocaust (the systematic massacre of Jews and minorities by Nazi Germany) during World War II. The difference between the two catastrophes is that in Nazi Germany, only the human society and the human ecosystem were attacked and a "human holocaust" took place, while in Vietnam, the natural society and plant and animal ecosystems were also destroyed. In other words, in addition to a "human holocaust," a parallel "ecological holocaust" occurred in Vietnam, which deserved criminalization. To this end, Galston used the same legal formula of Raphael Lemkin (who coined the term genocide), and introduced the new concept of "ecocide" from the combination of the Greek word "oikos" meaning ‘home, nature, and ecosystem’, and the Latin word "caedere" meaning ‘to kill, to cut down, and  to destroy’ to criminalize these destructive events. According to Galston's legal thought, just as the extermination of human groups is a crime against humanity and criminalized as "genocide" under international law, the destruction of natural ecosystem(s) is a crime against humanity and must be criminalized under "ecocide" by the United Nations in the form of a new international treaty. This is Galston's green legal legacy.
The legal idea of international criminalization of ecocide failed at the time, but after fifty years, the result of Galston's critical and green legal thought can be clearly observed in the legal definition of ecocide given by the "Independent Expert Panel for the Legal Definition of Ecocide" on June 22, 2021, which provided a new and ecological definition of this crime for criminalization as the Fifth International Crime and included in the Statute of the International Criminal Court (1998); This definition marks the paradigm shift in the sphere of international criminal law and the transition from a Anthropocentric to an eco-centric perspective. According to this definition:
"Article 8 ter: Ecocide

For the purpose of this Statute, “ecocide” means unlawful or wanton acts committed with knowledge that there is a substantial likelihood of severe and either widespread or long-term damage to the environment being caused by those acts.
For the purpose of paragraph 1:
“Wanton” means with reckless disregard for damage which would be clearly excessive in relation to the social and economic benefits anticipated;
“Severe” means damage which involves very serious adverse changes, disruption or harm to any element of the environment, including grave impacts on human life or natural, cultural or economic resources;
“Widespread” means damage which extends beyond a limited geographic area, crosses state boundaries, or is suffered by an entire ecosystem or species or a large number of human beings;
“Long-term” means damage which is irreversible or which cannot be redressed through natural recovery within a reasonable period of time;
“Environment” means the earth, its biosphere, cryosphere, lithosphere, hydrosphere and atmosphere, as well as outer space."

 
4. Conclusion
From a legal point of view, it can be argued that although Galston's legal idea is the first green step in the international criminalization of ecocide, the content of this innovative notion is not very clear, rich, comprehensive, and effective, and it cannot meet current legal needs of human societies and properly protect the planet Earth. The reason for this can be attributed to the recent emergence of this concept, Galston's lack of legal expertise, as well as the recent emergence of the two disciplines of international criminal law and international environmental law at that time. Nevertheless, the ecocide legal theory should still be considered Galston's legal legacy. Although he could not, unlike Raphael Lemkin, develop his legal idea and formulate a coherent legal theory of ecocide for its international criminalization, by inventing the concept of ecocide and proposing the idea of its international criminalization, he laid the first foundation of this green legal theory. Today and at the beginning of the third wave of criminalization of ecocide at the local, national, regional, and international levels, it can also be argued that Galston's legal thought has made its impact on the contemporary international criminal law. In fact, such a transformation in green vision in the sphere of international criminal law is the result of Galston green's legal thought and is, in fact, his "legal legacy." It was Galston who paved the way for this "green philosophical-ethical transition" in the international criminal law and ecocide criminalization alongside "genocide" and the recognition of "crimes against the environment" alongside "crimes against humanity." Now that the renaissance of the ecocide legal theory has begun, the international community in general and ecocide experts and researchers in particular can take positive steps by relying on each of Galston's four legacies to guarantee the right to a good environment and development of a coherent and effective criminal policy against ecocide in four local, national, regional, and international levels to protect the planet from severe, widespread, or long-term ecological harms.
 
Selection of References
Falk, Richad A. (1973), “Environmental Warfare and Ecocide: Facts, Appraisal and Proposals”, Bulletin of Peace Proposals, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 80-96.
Galston, Arthur W. (1967), “Changing the Environment: Herbicides in Vietnam, II”, Scientist and Citizen, August-September, Published online: 29 Jul 2010, pp. 123-129.
Galston, Arthur W. (2001), “Falling leaves and ethical dilemmas: Agent Orange in Vietnam”, In: Arthur W. Galston and Emily G. Shurr (eds), New Dimensions in Bioethics, Springer US, 2001, pp. 109–124.
Gray, Mark Allan (1995), “The International Crime of Ecocide”, California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 215-272.
Greene, Anastacia (2019), “The Campaign to Make Ecocide an International Crime: Quixotic Quest or Moral Imperative?”, Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 1-49.
Lawrence, Jessica C. and Kevin Jon Heller (2007), “The First Ecocentric Environmental War Crime:The Limits of Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute”, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20, Fall, pp. 1-40.
Zierler, David (2011), The Invention of Ecocide: Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the Scientists Who Changed the Way We Think About the Environment, Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia Press.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Galston
  • Ecocide
  • Crimes against Environment
  • Ecological warfare
  • Ecological Holocaust
  • Environment
احدی، رضا؛ رستگار مهجن‌آبادی، محمّدباقر و طغرانگار، حسن (1399)، «بازکاویِ عنصرِ روانی در جرایمِ با مسئولیّتِ مطلق با تأکیدِ بر جرایم علیهِ محیطِ­زیست»، مجلّة پژوهش­های حقوقی، شمارة 43، پاییز، ص 71-99.
اردکانی، محمّدرضا (1393)، اِکولوژی، چاپِ شانزدهم، تهران: مؤسّسة چاپ و انتشاراتِ دانشگاهِ تهران.
بابایی، مهدی (1396)، «بررسیِ جرم­شناختیِ جرایمِ زیست­محیطی (اِکوساید)»، پایان­نامة دورة کارشناسیِ ارشد، گرایشِ حقوقِ جزا و جرم­شناسی، دانشگاهِ تبریز، دانشکدة حقوق و علوم اجتماعی، گروهِ حقوق، بهمن ماه.
بختیاری ‌اصل، فریبرز (1377)، حفاظت از محیطِ­زیست در مخاصماتِ مسلّحانة بین‌المللی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشاراتِ وزارتِ امورِ خارجه.
جاسبی، عبدالله (1379)، ویتنام: دورانِ مقاومت، پیروزی و سازندگی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: مرکزِ انتشاراتِ علمیِ دانشگاهِ آزادِ اسلامی.
جیاپ، وونگوین (1376)، دین بین فو، ترجمة حمید عظیمی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشارات اطّلاعات.
حایری­پور، سام (1391)، 13 فاجعة انسان­ساخت در محیطِ­زیست، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشارات نشرِ شهر.
حجّار لیب، لیندا (1396)، حقوقِ بشر و محیطِ‌زیست: دورنمای فلسفی، نظری و حقوقی، ترجمة رضا امینی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
حیدری، آیدا و واعظی، سیّد مجتبی (1399)، «مسئولیّتِ کیفریِ دولت در حوزة اِکوساید»، فصلنامة پژوهش­های نوینِ حقوقِ اداری، دورة 2، شمارة 3، شمارة پیاپی 3، تابستان، ص 37-67.
دابسون، اندرو (1388)، اندیشة اجتماعی و سیاسیِ سبز، ترجمة محسن ثلاثی، چاپِ دوم، تهران: نشرِ جامعه­شناسان.
راسل، برتراند (1351)، جنگِ ویتنام، ترجمة صمد خیرخواه، چاپِ دوم، تهران: انتشارات شرکت سهامیِ انتشاراتِ خوارزمی.
راعی دهقی، هاجر و نجفی، جواد (1395)، «حفاظت از محیطِ­زیست در قبالِ خساراتِ ناشی از درگیریِ مسلّحانه»، فصلنامة علومِ محیطی، دورة چهاردهم، شمارة 2، تابستان، ص 139-153.
رمضانی قوام­آبادی، محمّدحسین (1390)، «از ممنوعیّت تا جرم­انگاریِ تخریبِ محیطِ­زیست در حقوقِ بین­الملل»، مجلّة تحقیقاتِ حقوقی، ضمیمة شمارة 56، ص 533-560.
رِی، میشِل (1360)، جنگ اِمریکا در ویتنام: گزارشِ روزنامه‌نگارِ فرانسوی، ترجمة شیوا ایزدپرست، تهران: نشرِ دانش.
زمانی، سیّد قاسم (1388)، «جرم­انگاریِ تخریبِ محیط زیست در حقوقِ بین­الملل»، در: احمدعلی محسن­زاده و همکاران (به­اهتمام)، حقوقِ محیطِ­زیست: نظریّه­ها و رویّه­ها، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشاراتِ خرسندی، ص 138-155.
شاملو، باقر و قلی‌پور، غلامرضا (1399)، «اِکوساید (بوم­زدایی): جنایتی علیهِ توسعة پایدار»، مطالعاتِ حقوقِ کیفری و جرم­شناسی، دورة 50، شمارة 1 (پیاپی 14)، بهار و تابستان، ص  137-162.
عبدالهی، محسن (1388)، «جنایت برضدِّ محیطِ­زیست در حقوقِ بین­الملل»، در: محسن عبدالهی و همکاران، حقوقِ کیفریِ محیطِ­زیست: ملاحظات و راهکارها، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشارات روزنامة رسمیِ جمهوریِ اسلامیِ ایران، ص 113-138.
بلامی فاستر، جان (1395)، زمین، سیّارة آسیب‌پذیر: تاریخِ اقتصادیِ کوتاهی از محیطِ‌زیست، ترجمة محسن صفّاری، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشاراتِ جهانِ ادیب.
قلی­پور، غلامرضا و مهرا، نسرین (1399)، «جنایتِ اِکوساید؛ گذشته، حال و آینده»، فصلنامة پژوهشِ حقوقِ کیفری، سالِ هشتم، شمارة سی­اُم، بهار، ص 43-81.
کارسون، راشل (1395)، بهارِ خاموش، ترجمة عبدالحسین وهّاب­زاده، چاپِ سوم، مشهد: انتشارات جهادِ دانشگاهیِ مشهد.
کالیون، کِنِت مک (1383)، «اجرای عدالت دربارة محیطِ­زیستِ بین­المللی: حقوق و راهِ­حلّ­ها»، ترجمة محمّدحسین زاهدین لبّاف، مجلّة حقوقیِ [بین­المللی]، شمارة سی­ویکم، ص 171-185.
کربز، چارلز جی. (1388)، بوم­شناسی، ترجمة عبدالحسین وهّاب­زاده، چاپِ یکم، مشهد: انتشارات جهادِ دانشگاهیِ مشهد.
گوین، فیلیپ (۱۳۹۶)، جنگِ ویتنام، ترجمة سهیل سُمّی، چاپِ چهارم، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
ماروما، مرما، کارل براش و جوردن دایاموند (1393). حمایت از محیط­زیست در مخاصماتِ مسلّحانه از منظرِ حقوقِ بین­الملل، ترجمه و تحقیق: سیّد علی حسینی آزاد و مهرداد محمّدی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: مؤسّسة مطالعات و پژوهش­های حقوقیِ شهرِ دانش.
موری، استوارت (1392)، جنگِ ویتنام: تاریخِ مقاومتِ یک ملّت، ترجمة شهروز ابراهیمی و زهرا بختیاری، چاپِ یکم، تهران: انتشاراتِ سبزان.
نامور، ر. (1359)، ویتنام از دیدگاهِ دادگاهِ نورنبرگ (ترجمه و تحقیق)، چاپِ یکم، بی‌جا، انتشاراتِ آذرنوش، جمعیّتِ ایرانیِ هوادارانِ صلح.
نژندی­منش، هیبت­الله؛ حسینی آزاد، سید علی و زحمتکش، مجید (1399)، «تأملّی در امکان‌سنجیِ اِعمال صلاحیّتِ دیوانِ بین‌المللیِ کیفری نسبت به جرایمِ زیست‌محیطی»، پژوهشنامة حقوقِ کیفری، پاییز و زمستانِ 1399، شمارة 22، ص 243- 270.
نصر اصفهانی، احمد؛ رئیسی، لیلا  و آرش‌پور، علیرضا (1399)، «جرم‌انگاریِ بین‌المللیِ زیست‌بوم‌زدایی»، مجلّة آموزه­های حقوقِ کیفری، دورة 17، شمارة 19، شمارة پیاپی 19، بهار و تابستان، ص 273-304.
نیس، آرنه (1399)، بوم­شناسی، اجتماع و سبکِ زندگی، ترجمة نسترن خسروی، چاپِ یکم، تهران: نشرِ بان.
Arthur W. Galston (1920 – 2008) (2002), Interviewed by Shirley K. Cohen 8 October 2002, Archives California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California Institute of Technology, Oral History Project,  California, https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/147007476.pdf, accessed on: 30 March 2021.
Berg, Céline Van den (2017), “Options for addressing instances of ecological harm under the Rome Statute, the added value of an autonomous international crime of ecocide, and its hurdles”, Master thesis, LLM International and European Law, International Law and Human Rights Track, Universiteit van Tilburg, Faculty of Law.
Bilotta, Ari (2019), “Should the Rome statute Include the Crime of Ecocide?”, last visited: 10 december 2019. available at: https://www.e-ir.info/2019/08/28/should-the-rome-statute-include-the-crime-of-ecocide/
Broswimmer, Franz J. (2002), Ecocide: A Short History of the Mass Extinction of Species. London, Pluto.
Cecil, Paul Frederick (1986), Herbicidal Warfare - The Ranch Hand Project in Vietnam, New York, Praeger.
Chou, Cecilia (2017), “Arthur William Galston (1920–2008)”, Embryo Project Encyclopedia (2017-04-27), last visited: 30 March 2021, http://embryo.asu.edu/handle/10776/11490.
Cook, Robert E., W. Haseltine and A. W. Galston (1970), “What Have We Done to Vietnam?”, In: Barry Weisberg (ed), Ecocide in Indochina: The Ecology of War, San Francisco, Canfield Press.
Crasson, Audrey (2017), “The case of Chevron in Ecuador: The Need for an International Crime against the Environment”, Amsterdam Law Forum, Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 29-48.
Crook, Martin and Damien Short (2014), “Marx, Lemkin and the genocide–ecocide nexus”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 298-319.
Drumbl, Mark A. (1998), “Waging War Against the World: The Need to Move from War Crimes to Environmental Crimes”, Fordham International Law Journal, Vol. 22, Issue 1, Article 3, pp. 121-153.
Erdem, Bedirhan (2020), “Ecocide”, in: Zelle, Anthony R., Grant Wilson, Rachelle Adam and Herman F. Greene, Earth Law: Emerging Ecocentric Law: a Practitioner's Guide, Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.
Falk, Richad A. (1973), “Environmental Warfare and Ecocide: Facts, Appraisal and Proposals”, Bulletin of Peace Proposals, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 80-96.
Falk, Richard A. (1974), “Ecocide, Genocide, and the Nuremberg Tradition of Individual Responsibility”, In: Virginia Held (ed), Philosophy, Morality, and International Affairs: Essays Edited for the Society for Philosophy and Public Affairs, New York, Oxford University Press, pp. 123–137.
Falk, Richard A. (2018), Revisiting the Vietnam War and International Law: Views and Interpretations of Richard Falk, Stefan Anderson (editor), First Publication, Cambridge University Press.
Feinberg , Kenneth R. (2012), Who Gets What: Fair Compensation after Tragedy and Financial Upheaval, New York, Public Affairs, 2012.
Fernández, Rosel Soler (2017), “El ecocidio: ¿crimen internacional?”, Localización: bie3: Boletín IEEE,  No. 8 (Octubre-diciembre), pp. 859-873.
Galston, Arthur (2002), “An Accidental Plant Biologist”, Plant Physiology, Vol. 128, No. 3, pp. 786-87.
Galston, Arthur W. (1967), “Changing the Environment: Herbicides in Vietnam, II”, Scientist and Citizen, August-September, Published online: 29 Jul 2010, pp. 123-129.
Galston, Arthur W. (1968), “Military Use of Herbicides in Vietnam”, New Scientist, 13 June, p. 10.
Galston, Arthur W. (1970), “Plants, People, and Politics”, BioScience, Vol. 20, No. 7, April, pp. 405-410.
Galston, Arthur W. (1972), “Science and Social Responsibility: A Case History”, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, Vol. 196, Issue 4, pp. 223-235.
Galston, Arthur W. (1974), “The Effect of 2,3,5–Triiodobenzoic Acid on the Growth and Flowering of Soybeans”, American Journal of Biology, Vol. 34, No. 7, pp. 356–360.
Galston, Arthur W. (1975a), “Vietnamese Hold No Grudge Against U.S., Leader Says”, The Hartford Courant, August 17.
Galston, Arthur W. (1975b), “Defoliant Remedy Called Urgent”, The Hartford Courant, August 10, 1975.
Galston, Arthur W. (1975c), “Vietnamese Journey”, Nature, November 6, 1975, pp. 2-4.
Galston, Arthur W. (1979), “Herbicides: A Mixed Blessing”, BioScience, Vol. 29, No. 2, February, pp. 85-90.
Galston, Arthur W. (1981), Green wisdom, New York, Basic Books.
Galston, Arthur W. (2001), “Falling leaves and ethical dilemmas: Agent Orange in Vietnam”, In: Arthur W. Galston and Emily G. Shurr (eds), New Dimensions in Bioethics, Springer US, 2001, pp. 109–124.
Galston, Arthur W. and Emily G. Shurr (eds) (2001), New Dimensions in Bioethics Science, Ethics and the Formulation of Public Policy, Boston, Springer.
Galston, Arthur W. and Ethan Signer (1971), “Education and science in north Vietnam”, Science, Vol. 174, Issue 4007, pp. 379-385.
Galston, Arthur W. and Jean S. Savag (1973), Daily life in people's China, New York, Crowell.
Galston, Arthur W. and Shirley K. Cohen (2004), Interview with Arthur W. Galston, Pasadena, CA: Caltech Archives, 2004. http://oralhistories.library.caltech.edu/150/1/Galston_OHO.pdf
Galston, Arthur William and Christiana Z. Peppard (eds) (2005), Expanding Horizons in Bioethics, New York, Springer.
Gauger, Anja et al (2012), “The Ecocide Project: ‘Ecocide is the missing 5th crime against peace’”, Human Rights Consortium, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Gray, Mark Allan (1995), “The International Crime of Ecocide”, California Western International Law Journal, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 215-272.
Greene, Anastacia (2019), “The Campaign to Make Ecocide an International Crime: Quixotic Quest or Moral Imperative?”, Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 1-49.
Higgins, Polly (2012), Earth is our business: Changing the Rules of play, London, Shepheard Walwyn Publishers Ltd.
Higgins, Polly (2015), Eradicating Ecocide: Laws and Governance to Prevent Destruction of our Planet, London, Shepheard Walwyn Publishers Ltd, Second Edition.
Higgins, Polly (2016), I DARE TO BE GREAT, London, Clink Street Publishing, Third Edition.
Higgins, Polly, Damien Short and Nigel South (2012), “Protecting the planet after Rio – the need for a crime of ecocide”, Centre for Crime and Justice Studies, No. 90, December, pp. 4-5.
Higgins, Polly, Damien Short and Nigel South (2013), “Protecting the planet: a proposal for a law of ecocide”, Crime, Law and Social Change, Vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 1-17.
Hites, Ronald A. (2010), “Dioxins: An Overview and History”, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 45, pp. 16–20.
Howold.co., Arthur Galston Biography, https://www.howold.co/person/arthur-galston/biography , last visited: 30 March 2021.
International Law Commission (1996), “Document on Crimes against the environment by Mr. Christian Tomuschat, Member of the Commission”, Extract from the Yearbook of the International Law Commission, Vol. II(1), pp. 16-27.
Johnstone, L. Graig (1971), “Ecocide and the Geneva Protocol”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 49, pp. 711-712.
Kalkandelen, Kübra and Darren O’Byrne (2017), “On ecocide: toward a conceptual framework”, Distinktion: Journal of Social Theory, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 333-349.
Lawrence, Jessica C. and Kevin Jon Heller (2007), “The First Ecocentric Environmental War Crime:The Limits of Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute”, Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, Vol. 20, Fall, pp. 1-40.
Leebaw, Bronwyn (2014), “Scorched Earth: Environmental War Crimes and International Justice”, American Political Science Association, Vol. 12, No. 4, December, pp. 770 - 788.
Lemkin, Raphael (1944), Axis rule in occupied Europe: laws of occupation, analysis of government, proposals for redress, Washington [D.C.], Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Division of International Law.
Lemkin, Raphael (1947), “Genocide as a Crime under International Law”, American Journal of International Law, Vol. 41, Issue 1, January, pp. 145-151.
Lindgren, Tim (2018), “Ecocide, genocide and the disregard of alternative life-systems”, The International Journal of Human Rights, Vol. 22, No. 4, pp. 525-549.
Lopez, Aurelie (2006), “Criminal Liability for Environmental Damage Occurring in Times of Non-International Armed Conflict: Rights and Remedies”, Fordham Environmental Law Review, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 231-271.
Lundberg, Jan (2004), “Resisting the war machine and U.S. ecocide”, Culture Change; Arcata, Issue. 76, 15 October.
Lyman Bruun, Lori (1993), “Beyond the 1948 Convention - Emerging Principles of Genocide in Customary International Law”, MD Journal of International Law & Trade, Volume 17, Issue 2, pp. 193-226.
Metha, Sailesh and Prisca Merz (2015), “Ecocide – a new crime against peace”, Environmental Law Review, Vol. 17, No. 1, pp. 3-7.
New York Times (1970), “... And a Plea to Ban ‘Ecocide’”, 26 February, A 38.
Pearce, Jeremy (2008), “Arthur Galston, Agent Orange Researcher, Is Dead at 88”, 23 June, last visited: 30 March 2021, https://www.nytimes.com/2008/06/23/us/23galston.html.
Pettigrew, Harry W. (1971), “A CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT OF FREEDOM FROM ECOCIDE”, Environmental Law, Vol. 2, No. 1, Winter, pp. 1-41.
Phuong-Lan, Bui Thi (2003), “When the Forest Became the Enemy and the Legacy of American Herhicidal Warfare in Vietnam”, A thesis presented To The Committee for Higher Degrees in History of American Civilization In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy In the subject of History of American Civilization, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, June.
Schabas, William A. (2000), Genocide in International Law: the Crimes of Crimes, United Kingdom, Cambridge University Press, First Publication.
SERRA PALAO, PABLO (2019), "ECOCIDIO: LA ODISEA DE UN CONCEPTO CON ASPIRACIONES JURÍDICAS", Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, Vol. X, Núm. 2, December, pp. 9-11.
Shuck, Peter H. (1987), Agent Orange on Trial: Mass Toxic Disasters in the Courts, Cambridge, Harvard University Press.
Stop Ecocide Foundation (2021), “Independent Expert Panel for the Legal Definition of Ecocide, Commentary and Core Text”, June, pp. 1-12.
Tabary, Camille (2015-2016), Should large – scale environmental crimes be recognized as a ‘core crime’ protected under the Rome Statute?, Master Thesis, L.L.M International Criminal Law, Columbia Law School and Universiteit Van Amsterdam.
Travis, Hannibal (2016), "Ecocide: A Brief History of an Explosive Concept", Preliminary Reference, 8 January, available at: http://cjel.law.columbia.edu/preliminary-reference/2016/ecocide-a-brief-history-of-an-explosive-concept/, last visited: 12 December 2020.
Turcios, Michael Anthony (2019), “Bearing Witness to Ecocide: Contagious Imperial Infrastructures at the Borderlands of Mexico and Palestine”, Spectator, Vol. 39, No. 1, Spring, pp. 36-44.
Whyte, David (2020), Ecocide: Kill the Corporation Before it Kills Us, Manchester University Press, 2020.
William Buckingham, Jr. (1982), Operation Ranch Hand: the airforce and herbicides in Southeast Asia, 1961- 1971, Washington, D.C.: Office of Air Force History, United States Air Force.
WorldCat Identities, Galston, Arthur W. (Arthur William) 1920-2008, last visited: 30 March 2021, http://worldcat.org/identities/lccn-n50016716/.
YaleNews (2008), “In memoriam: Arthur Galston, plant biologist, fought use of Agent Orange”, 18 july, last visited: 30 March 2021, https://news.yale.edu/2008/07/18/memoriam-arthur-galston-plant-biologist-fought-use-agent-orange.
Young, Alvin L. (2008), Final Report Agent Orange: A History of Its Use, Disposition, and Environmental Fate,  30 June,  This work was supported by the OFFICE OF THE UNDERSECRETARY OF DEFENSE (Mr. William Van Houten), under the auspices of the U.S. Army Research Office Scientific Services Program administered by Battelle (Delivery Order 0691, Contract No. DAAD19-02-D-0001).
Zierler, David (2011), The Invention of Ecocide: Agent Orange, Vietnam, and the Scientists Who Changed the Way We Think About the Environment, Athens, Georgia, University of Georgia Press.