نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی و اقتصادی، دانشگاه الزهرا ء،تهران، ایران
2 استادیار گروه معارف اسلامی، دانشکدۀ الهیات و معارف اسلامی، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
3 مدرس دانشگاه و پژوهشگر حقوق بینالملل، تهران، ایران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In recent years, autonomous weapons systems, especially military drones, have played an increasing role in armed conflicts. This article, using a descriptive and analytical approach, seeks to address the following questions: How can attacks carried out by autonomous weapons in general—and loitering munitions (LMs) in Lebanon in particular—be legally analyzed in light of potential violations of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution? What capacities does international criminal law offer for ensuring accountability in cases involving the unlawful use of autonomous weapons? The case study of Lebanon demonstrates that in certain instances, the use of drones has been accompanied by violations of the principles of distinction, proportionality, and precaution, thereby paving the way for the commission of war crimes. The absence of real-time human oversight and the difficulty in identifying direct responsibility pose fundamental challenges to legal accountability.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)