نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.
2 دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرمشناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code, in line with attention to the psychological characteristics of juveniles and avoiding strict criminal responsibility in crimes punishable by Hadd and Qisas, has introduced a valuable legal provision. However, referring the punishment in Article 91 to the legal provisions of Chapter 10 of the Islamic Penal Code—when one of the conditions mentioned in this article is met—has created ambiguity and led to inconsistent judicial practices. In judicial practice, not only are there different and sometimes conflicting interpretations regarding the determination of maturity , but the impossibility of applying Hadd and Qisas punishments in accordance with Articles 88 and 89 of the Islamic Penal Code is also challenging. The lack of clear criteria for determining maturity and sentencing has resulted in the violation of juveniles' rights in some cases, which contradicts the original purpose of this article. This study, using an analytical-descriptive method and relying on judicial rulings collected from Tehran courts, examines the prevailing judicial approach regarding the determination of maturity and sentencing under Article 91.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)