احراز رشد و تعیین کیفر در ماده 91 قانون مجازات اسلامی؛ مطالعه موردی پرونده‌های دادگستری تهران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 استادیار گروه حقوق، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه شاهد، تهران، ایران.

2 دکتری حقوق کیفری و جرم‌شناسی دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

ماده 91 قانون مجازات اسلامی با توجه به ویژگی‌های روان‌شناختی نوجوانان و عدم اعمال مسئولیت کیفری جهشی در جرایم مستوحب حد و قصاص، تدبیر ارزشمندی پیش‌بینی کرده است. ارجاع کیفر در ماده 91 به مواد قانونی فصل دهم قانون مجازات اسلامی در صورت وجود یکی از شرایط مذکور در این ماده دارای ابهام است و سبب تشتّت رویه شده است. در رویه قضائی تفسیرهای متفاوت و بعضاً متعارض در بحث احراز رشد وجود دارد و عدم امکان تطبیق مجازات‌های حد و قصاص با مواد 88 و 89 چالش برانگیز است. نامعین بودن ضابطه احراز رشد و کیفرگزینی در برخی پرونده‌ها موجب تضییع حقوق نوجوان شده است که این امر با هدف اولیه این ماده در تعارض است. در این نوشتار با روش تحلیلی-توصیفی و با استناد به آرای قضایی دادگستری شهر تهران، رویه قضایی حاکم بر احراز رشد و تعیین کیفر در ماده 91 مورد واکاوی قرار گرفته است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Achieving Maturity and Determining Punishment in Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code: A Case Study of Tehran Judiciary Cases

نویسندگان [English]

  • Sahar Soheilmoghadam 1
  • Amir Hossein Bahiraee 2
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Law, Faculty of Humanities, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.
2 PhD in Criminal Law and Criminology, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code, in line with attention to the psychological characteristics of juveniles and avoiding strict criminal responsibility in crimes punishable by Hadd and Qisas, has introduced a valuable legal provision. However, referring the punishment in Article 91 to the legal provisions of Chapter 10 of the Islamic Penal Code—when one of the conditions mentioned in this article is met—has created ambiguity and led to inconsistent judicial practices. In judicial practice, not only are there different and sometimes conflicting interpretations regarding the determination of maturity , but the impossibility of applying Hadd and Qisas punishments in accordance with Articles 88 and 89 of the Islamic Penal Code is also challenging. The lack of clear criteria for determining maturity and sentencing has resulted in the violation of juveniles' rights in some cases, which contradicts the original purpose of this article. This study, using an analytical-descriptive method and relying on judicial rulings collected from Tehran courts, examines the prevailing judicial approach regarding the determination of maturity and sentencing under Article 91.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Inconsistent rulings
  • crimes punishable by Hadd
  • crimes punishable by Qisas
  • lack of mental maturity and intellectual development
  • judicial sentencing

Abroshan, H., Sayebani, A., Gholami, H., & RazaviFard, B. (2021). " Investigating Legal Challenges of Adolescent Growth in Islamic Penal Code", Legal Research Quarterly, Vol.24, No. 93, PP. 303-324. doi: 10.29252/jlr.2021.185312.1717. [In Persian]

Abedi, A. (2022), A Practical Approach to General Criminal Law, Third edition, Tehran: Judiciary Publications Center. [In Persian]

Askaripour, H., Mahdavi Sabet, M. A., Ashouri, M., & Shambayati, H. (2024), " Feasibility of applying the provisions of multiplicity of crimes to children and adolescents in Iran's criminal policy”, Culmination of Law, Vol. 10, Issue 1, PP.109-137. Doi: 10.22034/thdad.2023.1973717.2298. [In Persian]

Bagheri, M., Alipour, H., & Fazli, M. (2022), "Challenges of Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code (2013) in Judicial Practice." Legal Research Quarterly, Vol.26, No. 104, PP. 292-310. Doi: 10.48308/jlr.2023.230168.2425. [In Persian]
Darvishi, S., & Norouzi, M. (2017). Criminal Maturity in the Islamic Penal Code and Judicial Practice (A Comparative Study with International Documents and Conventions), First edition,  Tehran: Majd Publications. [In Persian]
Fallah, A., & Haji Tabar Firouzjaei, H. (2023), "The Position of Criminal Maturity in Criminal Responsibility from the Perspective of Imami Jurisprudence and Iranian Law." Journal of Islamic law and Jurisprudence Researches, Vol. 71, PP.140-165. Doi: 10.22034/ijrj.2023.702563. [In Persian]

Ghamami, S. M. M., Feli, H., & Heydary, V. (2022), " Capacity assessment of the Iranian constitutional system to implement the national document on the rights of children and adolescents approved by the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution", Strategic Women’s Studies, Vol. 24, Issue.95, PP. 63-82. 10.22095/jwss.2022.332494.2946. [In Persian]

Gholami, H. (2014). "Models or Types of Juvenile Criminal Justice", Criminal Law Doctrines, Razavi university of Islamic sciences, Vol. 10, No. 6, PP. 89-106. [In Persian]
Golriz, A. (2014), A Complete Commentary on the Islamic Penal Code in Iran’s Criminal Justice System, Second edition, Tehran: Majd Publications. [In Persian]

Hajidehabadi, M. A., & Salimi, E. (2010). "Fundamentals, principle and practice of purposeful Penalization model", Journal of Criminal Law Research, Vol. 8, Issue. 29, PP. 101-134. Doi: 10.22054/jclr.2019.29306.1657 .[In Persian]

Kavosi Khasraghi, P., Javan Jafari Boojnordi, A., Seyyedzadeh Sani, S. M., & Gholami Doon, H. (2024), "Legal Inconsistencies with the Individualization policy of the Welfare Model in responding to the crimes of children and teenagers”, Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Research,Vol. 12, Issue 23, PP. 41-82. Doi: 10.22034/jclc.2022.352482.1726. [In Persian]
Mirsaeedi, S. M. (2007), Criminal Responsibility, second edition, Tehran: Mizan. [In Persian]
Moayedi, M. S. (2022), "Developments related to the criminal responsibility of children and adolescents in AH", Iranian Journal of Political Sociology, Vol. 24, PP. 2085-2101. Doi: 10.30510/psi.2022.316600.2673. [In Persian]

Nadi Babaei, H., Gholami, H., Haji Tabar Firouzjani, H., & Esmaeili, M. (2020). " The Pattern of Responsibility for Children & Juvenile’s Crimes in Iran's Judiciary (Case study: At the level of justice in Mazandaran province)”, The Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 84, No. 111, PP.173-191. Doi: 10.22106/jlj.2020.109536.2772. [In Persian]

Rostami, H., & Mousavi, P. (2020), "The Best Interests of Juvenile in Iranian Criminal Law: focusing on flexible punishment solutions",  The Judiciary Law Journal, Vol. 84, Issue112, PP.157-177. 10.22106/jlj.2020.112722.2879. [In Persian]
Rohami, M. (2002), “Criminal maturity”, law and political science, Vol.58, PP. 167-198. [In Persian]
Sabzevarinejad, H. (2012). "The System of Suspended Sentences: From Theory to Practice (A Comparative Study)", Journal of Legal Thought, Vol. 2, PP. 49-83. [In Persian]
Sadeghi, A. (2020), "Evaluation of Rehabilitation Approach in Sentencing Juvenile offenders", Biannual Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology Studies, vol. 50, No. 1, PP.163-179. 10.22059/jqclcs.2020.277504.1404. [In Persian]

Saboori Pour, M., & Alavi Sadr, F. (2015), " Juveniles' Age of Criminal Responsibility in Islamic Penal Code of 2013”, Criminal Law Research Journal, Vol. 6, No.1, PP. 171-194. [In Persian]

Tahmasebi, J., Petoft, A., & Zamani Babgohari, Z. (2023), Criminal Maturity in Article 91 of the Islamic Penal Code (Examining Legal, Psychological, and Neuroscientific Dimensions and Guidelines for Its Determination), First edition, Tehran: Judiciary Research Institute. [In Persian]
Tavajjohi, A. (2015), Pathology of the Islamic Penal Code (2013), First edition , Tehran: Judiciary Publications Center. [In Persian]
Zeraat, A. (2014). Punishments and Security Measures under the Islamic Penal Code (2013), second edition, Tehran: Jungle Publications. [In Persian]