نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری گروه حقوق جزا وجرم شناسی، دانشکده حقوق وعلوم سیاسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران
2 دانشیار دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
3 استاد دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.
4 گروه حقوق جزا، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه حلب.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
In an era of rapid information growth in cyberspace, the challenges of criminalizing and controlling the dissemination of misleading information have become prominent issues in ethics and criminal law. Opinions on criminalizing misleading information are divided into two groups: those supporting criminal intervention and those opposing it. This study examines the feasibility and justificatory frameworks for criminalizing misleading information in cyberspace. The main research question is how to justify the criminalization of misleading information dissemination from the perspective of criminal law philosophy. The article employs an inductive-deductive method, analyzing the criteria for justifying criminalization and applying them to the behavior of disseminating misleading information to determine its feasibility and limits. Focusing on four key criteria of criminal law philosophy—Filtering, Balance of Reasons, Social Acceptance, and Harm Prevention—this research demonstrates how these criteria can provide a justified framework for criminally addressing the dangers of misleading information in cyberspace.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
)