نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشیار گروه حقوق اسلامی، دانشکده حقوق، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
2 استادیارگروه حقوق، واحد خمینی شهر، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
موضوعات
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The philosophy of virtue ethics can serve as the foundation for a virtue-based criminal law. Proponents of this perspective assert that the descriptive concept of crime is derived from three key principles of virtue ethics (vice, akrasia, and enkratia). These moral constructs influence both the "foundation" and "extent" of criminal responsibility. The primary question, then, is how the scope of "criminal responsibility" is articulated based on these virtue ethics principles. Any approach taken regarding criminal responsibility will inevitably impact the domain of criminalization, whether it is "character-based" or "conduct-based." Some virtue ethicists argue that "character" is a necessary prerequisite for criminal responsibility, whereas other philosophers of criminal law emphasize the element of "conduct" in determining criminal liability. Adopting an analytical-critical method this article aims to assess the influence of these three virtue ethics concepts on the notion of crime, before presenting counterarguments to this position. The article argues that those three offer-mentioned dimensions of moral wrongdoing (vice, akrasia, and enkratia) do not function as a "necessary condition" within "descriptive" concept of crime. Consequently, the realm of criminalization and foundation of criminal responsibility cannot be solely formulated based on ethical concepts.
کلیدواژهها [English]
)