Temporary Order and Preservation of Object of Claim are two cautiously measures in the civil procedure code of Iran. By issuing them, enforcing of the verdict of court is easy in future. In spite of the similarities between two institutions, there are several differences between them including prompting of subject in the temporary order. Temporary Order is not protectable independently however preservation of object of claim is protectable independently. Possibility or Non- Possibility for protesting to temporary order through demanding, revision, retrial and protesting of the third party are important subjects in relating this order. In this article, the differences between temporary order and preservation of object of claim and methods of protesting on temporary order are discussed.
Abhari, H., Mohammadi, S., & Zareyi, R. (2010). The Differences between Temporary Order and Preservation of Object of Claim and Possibility of Protesting on Temporary Order. Criminal Law Research, 1(1), 3-18.
MLA
Hamid Abhari; Sam Mohammadi; Reza Zareyi. "The Differences between Temporary Order and Preservation of Object of Claim and Possibility of Protesting on Temporary Order". Criminal Law Research, 1, 1, 2010, 3-18.
HARVARD
Abhari, H., Mohammadi, S., Zareyi, R. (2010). 'The Differences between Temporary Order and Preservation of Object of Claim and Possibility of Protesting on Temporary Order', Criminal Law Research, 1(1), pp. 3-18.
VANCOUVER
Abhari, H., Mohammadi, S., Zareyi, R. The Differences between Temporary Order and Preservation of Object of Claim and Possibility of Protesting on Temporary Order. Criminal Law Research, 2010; 1(1): 3-18.
)