Elected Prosecutor: Basics and Historic Grounds

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Ph.D student, of criminal law and criminology

2 Assistant Professor, University of Tehran, College of Farabi.

Abstract

It has only passed a few centuries since the emergence of prosecutor’s office as the institution to prosecute crimes. This French institution with medieval roots was incrementally developed and evolved like many other institutions. During human history and in different countries, irrespective of their prosecutor’s office system, the prevailing way to choose the prosecutor was selection. The way to choose the prosecutor is important due to his paramount authorities and influence. Such high importance in judicial system convinced US legal system to use a unique way to choose the prosecution officials: elections. USA is the only nation in the world in which voters elect the prosecutor. Question: how such position is formed while there is no similar position like it in the world? The present paper initially investigates historic grounds and political contexts to expound the evolution of prosecutor’s position in the USA from a general prosecution position, to a local official and then to a public local prosecution authority. Then by considering the same historic trend, it introduces such aims as securing the independence of prosecutor’s office authorities, prosecutor’s more responsiveness to local jurisdiction and more supervision by people over government as the basics of such institution

Keywords

References

آشوری، محمد (1388)، آیین دادرسی کیفری، جلد اول، چاپ پانزدهم، تهران: انتشارات سمت.
بیتهام، دیوید؛ بویل، کوین (1386)، دموکراسی چیست؟ (آشنایی با دموکراسی)، [ترجمه] شهرام نقش تبریزی، چاپ چهارم، تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
خالقی، علی (1389)، آیین دادرسی کیفری، چاپ هشتم، تهران: شهر دانش.
رجبی، عبدالله؛ کریمیان، اسماعیل (1389)، «مسند قضا و استقلال قضایی»، پژوهشنامه حقوقی (پژوهشنامه حقوق کیفری)، سال اول، شماره اول، ص 93-73.
زین، هاوارد (1389)، رؤیای آمریکایی (روایتی دیگر از تاریخ مردم آمریکا)، [ترجمه] فاطمه شفیعی سروستانی، تهران: نشر هلال.
ژگو، ژان (1354)، «وظایف دادسرا در امور مدنی فرانسه»، [ترجمه] صدرزاده­ی افشار، مجله­ی حقوق و علوم سیاسی دانشگاه تهران، شماره 18، ص 30-20.
کوشکی، غلامحسن (1389)، «بررسی جایگاه سازمانی دادستان در آیین دادرسی کیفری ایران و فرانسه»، مجله­ی تحقیقات حقوقی، ویژه­نامه­ی شماره 2، ص 610-565.
گانینگ، جیمز پاتریک (1385)، درک دموکراسی: رویکردی بر انتخاب عمومی (تحلیل اقتصادی نهادهای سیاسی)، [ترجمه] محسن رنانی و محمد خضری، تهران: انتشارات سازمان مدیریت و برنامه­ریزی کشور.
گیدنز، آنتونی (1392)، جامعه­شناسی، [ترجمه] حسن چاوشیان، ویراست چهارم، چاپ هشتم، تهران: نشر نی.
Burbank, Stephen B. (2003), What do we meant by Judicial Independence, Ohio State Law Journal, vol. 64: 323.
Ellis. Michael J. (2012). The Origins of the Elected Prosecutor, The Yale law journal, Vol. 121, No. 6: 1528-1569.
Gordon, Sanford C.; Huber, Gregory A. (2002), Citizen Oversight and the Electoral
Incentives of Criminal Prosecutors, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, 334-351.
Hemmens, Craig; Brody, David C.; Spohn, Cassia C. (2012). Criminal Courts: A Contemporary Perspective, 2nd ed, London: SAGE Publications.
Jacoby, Joan E. (2005), American Prosecutor in Historical Context, (journal)Prosecutor, Vol. 39, No. 2, 34-46.
Jacoby, Joan E. (2005), American Prosecutor in Historical Context (2), (journal)Prosecutor, Vol. 39, No. 3, 28-38.
Kinaga, Karl; Jordan, Robert F. (1962). Some Limitations and Controls of The California Grand Jury System, Santa Clara Law Review,Vol. 2, No 1.
     Available at: http://digitalcommons.law.scu.edu/lawreview/vol2/ iss1/7 
Klerman, Daniel M. & Paul G. Mahoney (2005), The Value of Judicial Independence: Evidence from Eighteenth Century England, American Law and Economics Review, Vol. 7 No. 1.
Langbein, John H. (1979). Understanding the Short History of Plea Bargaining, Faculty Scholarship Series, Yale Law School Faculty Scholarship, Vol. 13: 261-272.
McCormack, Michael T. (2004). The Need for Private Prosecutors: An Analysis of Massachusetts and New Hampshire Law, SUFFOLK University Law Reviewe, Vol. 37(XXXVII): 497- 511.
Minser, Robert. (1996). Recasting prosecutorial discretion, Journal of criminal law and criminology, Vol. 86, issue 3: 717-758.
Schotland, Roy A. (2002). Myth, Reality Past and Present, and Judicial Elections, Indiana Law Review, Vol. 35: 659-667. Available at: http://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/203/
Surrency, Erwin C. (1967). The Courts in the American Colonies, The American Journal of Legal History, Vol. 11, No. 3, 253-276.
Vlasihin, Vasiliy A. (1979). The Prosecutor in American Criminal Procedure: Observations of a Foreign Student, Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Vol. 12, 833-867.
      Available at: http://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol12/iss4/3
Wright, Ronald  F. (2009), How Prosecutor Elections Fail Us, Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law, Vol. 6, No. 2, 649-660. Available at: http://works.bepress.com/ronald_wright/10
Worral, John L. (2008). Prosecution in America, Albany (USA): state university of New York press.
Worral, John L.; Nugent-Borakove, M. Elaine. (2008). The Changing Role of the American Prosecutor, state university of New York press, Albany.
Criminal Law Research
Volume 8, Issue 2 - Serial Number 16
Papers
January 2018
Pages 163-182

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics